Just as a quick follow-up to my previous post about file format issues with scanned microfilm images:
The question was asked whether or not the scanned image produces a better image. In a word, yes. In pictures, see below. Both images were from my research yesterday. You can easily see why, after needing two copies of each page so that one side of each was readable, I switched to the scanner. The experimental technique of adjusting light/darkness would have ended up costing me a fortune in copies and been a huge waste of paper and time. The scanner got it on the first try. Even if you’ve been intimidated by these scanners, I hope the image comparison below will convince you to jump in with both feet! (Click image for full size)
Thanks for this illustration, Chris. I will opt for a scanner the next time I need microfilm copies — IF the facility has a scanner.
This is great. High tech can certainly save time and money and produce better results at times.