Follow Friday: The Legal Genealogist

I don’t normally post in the “Follow Friday” theme, but if you haven’t heard or read about it yet, you need to check this one out. It’s the Legal Genealogist blog, by Judy Russell. I’m not the first one to tout its wonderfulness, but I think it bears repeating.

Judy offers concise, wonderfully written, and wonderfully informative posts about the ways in which the law and genealogy interact. In simple language and casual style, Judy tackles questions that help us understand how laws in effect at a given time and place affected documents’ creation and recording, and also how it affects our modern interpretation of them. How old did someone have to be to sign a document? What was the real purpose of a marriage bond? What was an Esquire? Go to her blog and find these answers and more.

Have a question about a law? Judy is willing to help. Simply submit the question via her Ask TLG page and wait for the magic to happen.

I recently wrote a response to a thread on the APG Members mailing list asking advice in creating a blog. In my response, I made four suggestions, based on my own experience reading and writing blogs (paraphrased here):

1. Be committed to writing, and writing regularly

2. It’s all about the content

3. Don’t use it solely to sell yourself and your services

4. Be interactive and participate in the blogging community

If this were the grading rubric, Judy and the Legal Genealogist blog get an A+.

Run, don’t walk, to check out this great resource!

Posted in Thoughts and Musings | Leave a comment

On the BCG Clock!

Well, kids, for those who don’t already know – I’m on the BCG clock. That’s right, I have a December 20th 2012 date with the BCG judges. I have about 11 more months to get my portfolio together, spiffied up, and sent in.

What’s involved? If you are interesed in the requirements, grading criteria, and other information, check the BCG website for all the details.

Why am I doing this? Because I am interested in producing the highest quality work possible, I want my work to be judged. I view achieving certification not as an “end”, but really more of a beginning. For me, achieving certification would be validation of all the time and effort I’ve spent learning, digging, and sweating over this family history stuff. I can’t wait to get both feet firmly planted on top of this first major step. I’ll look back over where I started, smile and enjoy it for a while, and then keep climbing.

I’ve heard some people say they don’t want to go on the clock until their requirements are almost finished. I work to deadlines, and I work under pressure. I need that thing ticking in the background to keep me motivated. If there’s anyone reading this who is on the clock in about the same time frame, let me know and we can keep each other moving! Onward and (hopefully) upward!

Posted in Thoughts and Musings | 3 Comments

New Presentation Idea: Tech Tools for Technologically-Challenged Genealogists

While I was working on a project last night, it suddenly struck me: I use a lot of different technology tools to do various tasks involved in genealogical research. I had been banished from my desktop computer because my wife needed to feed her Solitare and Mahjong addictions. I shuffled off to the family room, hopped on the laptop, opened up my Dropbox folder, and continued working right where I left off.

*Ding!* It occurred to me that probably only a handful of people in the local, “offline” genealogy societies had probably ever even heard of Dropbox, let alone how it could be useful in their research. Most of these sorts of tools, while technology-based, really aren’t all that scary, and don’t take a great deal of effort to learn to use effectively. It’s time to take these tools to the masses.

I think I will call this presentation: “Ten Hi-Tech Tools for Low-Tech Genealogists, ” One benefit of the format is that it allows a different selection of ten tools each time out of the gate. They can be adjusted according to anticipated audience proficiency, but also added and dropped as new things come along.

Here are the ten I started with (in no particular order), and I will be adding more as they come to me.

  1. Dropbox – here, there, and everywhere
  2. Transcription (transcription software with built-in image viewer)
  3. Digital camera – the wand scanner before there was a wand scanner
  4. Picassa – free and easy
  5. Google (focus on reader and alerts)
  6. Evernote – I just started playing around with this one
  7. SnagIt – sure SHIFT+PrtScn works, but this works better
  8. FamilySearch (highlighting catalog and wiki, rather than collections)
  9. Social Media – it need not frighten you
  10. Blogs – it’s a funny word, isn’t it? What you can find in other folk’s blogs, and why you might want to start one

Of course, at about five minutes per tool, this is not a study in excruciating detail – just a way to share some things people might want to check out a little further for themselves. What tools do you use that you think should be added to the list?

Posted in Thoughts and Musings | 11 Comments

Terminology Tuesday: Curtesy

I have been lecturing frequently at various local genealogical societies about using deeds in genealogical research. While I can talk pretty fast, and pack a lot into an hour, some stuff just doesn’t quite fit. Here’s one of them.

Curtesy (kər-tə-see) – “At common law, a husband’s right, upon his wife’s death, to a life estate in the land that his wife owned during their marriage, assuming that a child was born alive to the couple.”1

Not only is the information contained within any given deed regarding kinship useful on its own merit, but it can be even more so in sorting out conflicting evidence in intestate estates. An interesting thing about curtesy is that the child need not be alive at the time of the wife’s death: “It was necessary only that a child had been born alive. The widower’s tenancy by the curtesy in his late wife’s estate ended upon his death, and the heirs of the wife (usually the children) took title.”2

The example below is from Delaware, whose statutes in place at the time concur with these definitions.3

The concept of curtesy (actually introduced, in this case, in Orphans Court proceedings) is crucial to resolving conflicts between, and errors within, documents regarding my Staats family in 18th century Delaware. How did I apply this? For the sake of brevity, I am omitting a large part of the proof argument in order to specifically discuss curtesy. Necessary background information includes: Elijah Staats was born between 1760 and 1765.4 Abraham Harman and Sarah Richardson were married at least some time prior to Abraham’s death in 17815, and that Sarah (Richardson) Harman married David Staats sometime between 1782 and 1783.6

  • An 1808 deed from Elijah Staats contains a chain of title stating that the property he was selling descended as follows: Abraham Harman died intestate, leaving three sons: John, Abraham, and Benjamin. This property was divided equally, and John and Abraham sold their shares. Benjamin retained his, and also died intestate. At the time of his death, his brothers John and Abraham were also deceased, “whereupon the above described land descended to his two half brothers to wit, Richard Staats (who is since deceased and without issue) and Elijah Staats above named…”7
  • Letitia Richardson, widow of John Richardson, died in 1791 leaving a will. Her will names grandchildren Benjamin Harman, Elijah Staats, and Richardson Staats. At the time of her will, both John and Abraham Harman (mentioned in the deed above) were still living, but are not mentioned in the will.8
  • a 17 Jan 1792 petition by Robert Johnston stating John Richardson had four children , including “Sarah who intermarried with David Staats and is since dec’d, leaving issue by the said David three children, to wit, Benjamin, Richardson and Elijah, and the said David Staats her survived, and thereby became tenant by the courtesy of the said Sarah’s undivided fifth part of her said father’s real estate”9
  • a 1 Mar 1808 petition by Elijah Staats indicating that one of the children of John Richardson was “Sarah who intermarried with David Staats (the petitioner’s father) and is since dead and has no other issue living than the petitioner…”10

This situation is also an example of the need to conduct an exhaustive search, as looking at any one of these documents individually will not yield the complete story, and will likely lead to an erroneous conclusion. Relying solely on the 1808 deed, we might be tempted to arrange the family this way: Abraham and wife were married and had three kids: John, Abraham, and Benjamin. The wife was then married to someone named Staats and had two kids, Richard and Elijah. And we’d be wrong.

Looking at only the 1792 petition would leave us with the impression that Sarah had three children by David Staats: Benjamin, Richardson, and Elijah. And we’d be wrong.

Looking at the 1808 petition, it is directly stated that the petitioner (Elijah) is a son of David, so it would be REALLY, REALLY tempting to assume it to be so. And we’d be wrong. (Note: a deeper, more detailed exploration of potential fathers for Elijah is contained in a yet-to-be published article, but omitted here).

Careful examination of the above information, viewed in the light of intestate law, and law governing curtesy gives us the following picture of these families.

Abraham Harman was first married to an unknown spouse and had two children by that marriage; John and Abraham. It is clear from other Orphan’s Court proceedings omitted here that John and Abraham are older than Benjamin, who was still a minor in 1798 when a third bond was issued in the Abraham Harman estate (This third bond also implies that David Staats was deceased prior to 1798).11 Additionally, Sarah Richardson’s mother, Letitia, does not name either John or Abraham Harman as grandchildren in her will, suggesting they were not children of Sarah.

Abraham Harman did marry Sarah (Richardson), and had child Benjamin, who IS mentioned in Letitia’s will. Abraham died in 1781. Sarah (RIchardson)(Harman) married David Staats between 1782-1783. For a variety of reasons, some again omitted here, David cannot be the father of Elijah, who was born almost twenty years earlier than David and Sarah’s marriage. This and other evidence12 suggests that Sarah was first married to another Staats man, almost certainly a brother of David Staats,  prior to her marriage to Abraham Harman

This is where the concept of curtesy comes in, however. According to the 1792 petition, David clearly did have tenancy by curtesy. Therefore, David Staats and Sarah DID have a child together. That child is almost certainly Richard(son).Obviously, compared with the 1808 deed, the wording of this docket is off, however – David is not the father of all three children. Regardless, that inaccuracy doesn’t affect the ruling here.

Does this explanation work with the extensive chain of title in the deed? Yes. Elijah and Richardson would still be half brothers of Benjamin Harman, even if they are half-brothers to each other.

How does the concept of curtesy affect the O.C. statement that David was Elijah’s father? Elijah is inheriting the former property of John Richardson through his mother. Who his father was is irrelevant to the proceedings, since under the laws of curtesy, he is inheriting through his mother, not his father. David was Elijah’s step-father (and most likely, his uncle, too). Any number of scenarios allow for the record to be recorded as it was, but ultimately, the ruling was correct and what was expected, so who would have cause to question wording in a docket book they likely never saw? I mean besides us genealogists, of course!

Having waded through all that, you can imagine why I can’t fit that into a lecture very conveniently (although I do summarize the family groups – the deed is my example of chain of title). Again,a large part of the article has been omitted here, so if you are looking for holes in the blog post, you may very well find some! My intent here is simply to introduce the term to folks who may not have heard it, and show an example of how knowing and applying the law to your research can make a fuzzy picture at least a little bit less fuzzy

If you would do me the courtesy of leaving me your thoughts on curtesy and my example of its use, I will perform a virtual curtsy in appreciation.

 

  1. Bryan A. Garner, editor, Black’s Law Dictionary, 8th edition, (St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West, 2004), 411. []
  2. Val D. Greenwood, The Researcher’s Guide to American Genealogy, (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Pub. Co., 2000), p. 485. []
  3. Delaware, Laws of the State of Delaware, from  the Second Day of January, One Thousand Eight Hundred and Twenty Seven, to the Sixteenth Day of February One Thousand Eight Hundred an Twenty Nine,” (Dover, 1829), 77; digital images, Google Books (http://books.google.com/books?id=Ax5FAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false: accessed 20 Nov 2011);  “If the intestate leave a husband, who shall have had by said intestate during their marriage issue born alive, whether such issue have lived or died, such husband shall hold all such lands, tenements or hereditaments for the term of his life, as tenant by the curtesy.” []
  4. Elijah’s age is consistently reported in the 1810-1840 censuses, and by calculation is 1760-1765. 1810 U.S. census, Fayette, Pennsylvania, Luzerne Twp, p. 964 1/2, line 28, Elijah Stotts; digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 15 Nov 2009); citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm M252, roll 54.  1820 U.S. census, Harrison, Ohio population schedule, Freeport Twp., p. 91, line 6, Elijah Staats; digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 28 Sep 2011); citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm M33, roll M33_93. 1830 U.S. census, Harrison, OH, Freeport Twp, p. 226, line 13, Elijah Statts; digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 31 Jan 2009); citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm M19, roll 133. 1840 U.S. census, Monroe, OH, Union Twp, p. 83, line 25, “Elijah Stales”; digital images, Ancestry.com (http://www.ancestry.com : accessed 31 Jan 2009); citing National Archives and Records Administration microfilm M704, roll 416. []
  5. New Castle, Delaware, Probate Files, RG 2454.001, Abraham Harman (1781-1788), administrator’s bond for Sarah Harman (1781); DPA film no. 191, Delaware Public Archives, Dover. []
  6. ibid, administrator’s bond for David Staats (1788). []
  7. New Castle County, Delaware, Deed Books, H3:227, Elijah Staats to Lydia Smith, 10 Aug 1808. []
  8. New Castle, Delaware, Probate Files, will of Letitia Richardson (1791), Delaware Public Archives. []
  9. New Castle County, Delaware, Orphan’s Court Docket Books G:290, petition of Robert Johnson (1792); FHL microfilm 006,547. []
  10. New Castle County, Delaware, Orphan’s Court Docket Books J:546, petition of Elijah Staats (1808); FHL microfilm 006,548. []
  11. New Castle, Delaware, Probate Files, Abraham Harman (1781-1788), administrator’s bond for Robert Johnson, 30 May 1798. []
  12. Other evidence primarily involves the estate transactions of Jacob Staats Senior. []
Posted in Family Findings, How-To, Thoughts and Musings | Comments Off

In Before the Ball Drops: A Review of my 2011 Goals

With the end of the year just a few days away, it is time to make that dreaded visit to the always-ambitious list created one year ago.

What craziness had I set out for myself this year and how did I do? Each goal will be rated: “Check”, “Nope”, or “Kinda”, with a description of progress or the lack thereof. You might be asking yourself, “But Chris, why would I want to read about your old goals?” The answer: I have no idea, but people seem to read these posts for some unknown reason, and quite honestly, I checked my own list occasionally throughout the year to see where I stood. Putting goals down in writing is a definite plus…as is putting them out publicly for everyone to humiliate you if you don’t meet them.

Without further adieu, I grade myself:

1.   Continue making progress with the Delaware Staats families research
Self-explanatory. While I haven’t broken down the wall yet, I have cracked it a little. As long as it is a little weaker at the end of the year than it is now, I will be happy.

Check. I uncovered some new info, but more importantly, I finally got some of my thoughts down in writing in an actual proof argument. Progress comes slowly when you’ve been working a family for years, but damned if I didn’t do it.  I should get extra credit for this one.

2.   Publish two articles beyond the local society newsletter level.
This I especially true since I happen to edit my local society’s newsletter! I want to publish one methodology article and one family narrative this year – preferably at the state society or similar level.

Check. Kinda. I had two articles accepted for publishing, but one article that was supposed to appear this month didn’t. But I’m in the holiday spirit, and am giving myself the benefit of the doubt for a late Christmas gift. Cross it off. One of the articles was about using the NARA online ordering system, the other about professionalism.

3.   Finish the NGS Home Study Course
I need to finish the last lesson of the first CD before I lose or break it. And then I need to finish the next two CDs. At least I don’t own CD 3 yet, so it is not in danger.

Nope. I didn’t even get the first CD done, although all I had to left to do was write a measly paragraph to finish it. Because there were no deadlines, this kept getting pushed back in a crunch, and never made it off the back burner. I was engaged in ProGen 8 simultaneously, and ProGen took priority. Maybe one day I’ll try NGS again, but probably not.

4.   Begin (as in actually start the application) the BCG certification process.
No more cheating here and saying that this or that “helps towards getting ready.” I need that pre-application filled out, and that document to start the application in my hands before the ball drops on 2012

Check. That’s right, I did it. I look forward to working on the application over the next year. Plus it makes for an automatic gimme when I set some goals for next year. Since I already used some of the work I had planned to use for submission, I have my work cut out for me over the next year to make sure I have a chance to pass the first time out.

5.   Produce a high-quality newsletter for my local genealogical society.
As of the 1st, I am officially the newsletter editor for the East Cuyahoga County Genealogical Society. One of the things I think I was brought in to do was to help start e-delivery. With that option, the content and layout options are greatly enhanced, and I hope to deliver an appealing newsletter with great content that people can’t wait to get in their inbox (or mailbox, if the whole e-thing fails!)

Check. The change to e-delivery went pretty smoothly. I’ve had several nice comments about the newsletter. One person claimed at the last meeting that it was the best newsletter of any group. I think her lemonade may have fermented some, but I’ll take the compliment. Cross this one off, too. Extra credit here, too.

6.   Begin speaking/lecturing, with a focus on land records and mapping.
Land records always scare people. Maps sometimes scare people. I occasionally scare people. We were meant to be together.

Check. Despite forgetting to breathe for about 8 minutes the first time out, it seemed to have gone pretty well. It lead to some more speaking gigs, and in fact I have two coming up next week. Speaking is still a little out of my comfort zone, but apparently within my skill set. Full steam ahead! More topics are in the works (Hey look – another easy goal for next year). What the heck – extra credit for a job well done. Thanks, Chris. You’re welcome, Chris.

I’m going to lump the next three together, as they all have to do with business goals.

7.    Double the amount of Staats Genealogical Services research clients for compared with 2010.
8.   Finish the Staats Genealogical Services website.
9.   Work to standardize correspondence, reporting, and record keeping formats.

Nope. Kinda. Kinda. Sadly, of all the goals on my list, the ones directly related to business were the least successful. Why? I’m not entirely sure, to be honest, but it’s something I definitely need to investigate as I move forward. Fr a large part of the year…okay, for all of the year, I was finishing ProGen 8. While the monthly assignments were not overwhelming, they did take time to complete. Many of the assignments were along the lines of what I had hoped to do, business-wise. However, between ProGen, work, client projects, and all the volunteer society things I’ve been doing (not to mention family), I just never quite had time to focus on business stuff. Another, more disturbing possibility is simply that I am just not good at the business end of things. I have no doubt that I am an excellent researcher. I know I can write, and I am improving as a speaker. But when it comes time to sit down and hammer out some business projects, I really struggle. Time will tell. I really only have through the summer to focus on the business of genealogy. If it’s not producing at least a little more, I will be forced to abandon efforts to develop the business and refocus on getting a “real job.” *shudders*

10. Increase my  social media presence as a business.

Check…kinda. While I did create a facebook page for Staats Genealogical Services, I’ve not done much with it. Most of my genealogical interaction has still been through my personal facebook page. Perhaps I need to sit down and think about at least creating groups. Hey, that sounds like a new goal!

Final tally: 72% (10 points for “check,” 5 points for “kinda,” and 2 points for “nope.” I get points for “nope” because even though I didn’t get it done, I did make an effort in most cases)

I think this is about where I was last year, point-wise. It’s not a bad score for an ambitious agenda. As I begin thinking about next year it is tempting to scale back in order to give myself a higher score. In the end though, I doubt I will. I’d rather get 72% on an ambitious set of goals than a 90% on a lame set. OH CRAP! I forgot about my extra credit. Graded on a curve, using math so complex, I don’t even understand it (I think it has something to do with Chaos Theory) I actually ended up with an 80%. Yay, me!

Best of luck in meeting your goals, whatever they may be in 2012. Happy New Year every one!

Chris

Posted in Fun!, Thoughts and Musings | 4 Comments

Christmas in Caldwell (Ohio), 1880

Merry Christmas 2011! Last January, I happened across this 1880 advertisement while researching something else, and thought it would be fitting come the next Christmas time. It is nothing short of a Christmas miracle that I happened to remember it today. Even 131 years ago: 1) Parents are hard-pressed to fool their children about Santa Claus, and 2) Christmas and commercialism had already bonded.

Enjoy, and may you and yours have a very Merry Christmas or whichever holiday celebrations you enjoy!

Milt. James' Toy Store advertisement, 1880 ("Milt James Toy Store advertisement," (Caldwell, OH) Caldwell Citizens Press, 16 Dec 1880, p. 2. )

 

 

Posted in Fun! | Comments Off

George B. Turner Collection: Letters Home from the Civil War

Ohio Department of the Adjutant General, "National Colors of the 92nd O.V.I.," in Ohio Civil War 150 | Collections & Exhibits, Item #1399, http://www.ohiocivilwar150.org/omeka/items/show/1399 (accessed December 21, 2011).

 



Today, I had the pleasure of finding absolutely nothing while scrolling through reel after reel of microfilm. My mom had some research to do at the Ohio Historical Society in Columbus, Ohio, so I volunteered to go along although I had no research plan prepared in advance. The night before, I quickly compiled a list of newspaper and county microfilms to check the following day. During my late-night search, I also came across a finding aid for a small manuscript collection consisting of the Civil War correspondence of a man named George B. Turner. Mr. Turner happened to have served in the same regiment as my Civil War ancestor, Archelaus Osborne, and I thought it might provide some potential background information about the 92nd OVI – shedding a little light on what my own ancestor might have experienced.

Arriving at the Ohio Historical Society, I dutifully performed negative search after negative search. Admitting a little boredom, I nixed the last few rolls of film from the to-do list. I wandered out to the main library and filled ouit the call slip for the manuscript and waited for its arrival. A clerk came bearing a smallish box. “Oh good,” I thought, “I should be able to get copies of this without selling a kidney.” Upon opening it, however, I discovered that there was more within the folders than I had anticipated. Much more, in fact.

The original collection consists of five folders containing letters written from George B. Turner to his parents and siblings. I quickly realized that the collection was beyond “copy size”. Mr. Turner was clearly an articulate, thoughtful man. And prolific. By my estimation, there were somewhere around 250 letters written between Aug 1862 and Nov 1863. By rough estimate, he seemed to write a letter every 4-5 days or so – sometimes multiple letters on the same day.

I started off reading the first five or six, and I was immediately hooked. The personalities, the emotion, the power leaped from the pages. The collection opens with an exchange of letters between George, his father, mother and brother. In them he thoroughly details his reasons for joining – his passion in evidence. He remains a considerate son, stating that theirs are the only opinions he values, and while he carefully weighs them, they do not change his mind. He reassures his mother, and off we go on a fabulously detailed journey. Given the size of the collection, I was forced to start skimming letters. Each had the location he was writing from and the date it was written. I flipped through, reading those that showed a change in location. The letters detailed many things: the travels, the conditions, descriptions of the locales he was in, and so many other wonderful details of his journey. He asked about those at home, showed his appreciation of their letters, and assured them of his wellness.

There is no possible way I can convey the way this young man’s writing made him very real to me. He was someone I know, a friend I’ve had, a neighbor, and family member. All this was conveyed in the brief time I had to look at the collection. As time ran short, I had to skip a few of the folders, and turned to the last one. In addition to the letters, the final folder contained some newspaper clippings. One of the clippings from the Marietta newspaper contained a list of names, so I read throiugh that to see if there were any that I recognized. I didn’t, but as a scanned up to the headline, I had a bad feeling. The first line confirmed it: “Marietta is now mourning the death of two of her most promising young men, Capt. Wm. Beale Whittlesey and Lieut. George B. Turner, 92d O.V.I., who fell at the Battle of Mission Ridge, Nov. 25, 1863″

I actually gasped. This was not the ending I wanted, not the ending at all. Being a tough guy, I was able to choke back a few tears, but not for long. Reading his last few letters, as well as the letter written in response to his parents’ inquiry about the circumstances of their son’s death, I mourned the loss of George B. Turner. I felt for his parents and family. I felt for those that knew him – his minister and friends. I wished I could send a card or letter. I wished I could have met George and have shaken his hand. Like that movie that doesn’t have the happy ending – I just waited for the “Aha – just kidding, he’s actually fine” letter. It never came.

My little tribute here cannot do justice to this collection. If you live in or around Ohio, you owe it to yourself to take an hour or two to read through these letters. I later called the second box, which is a typescript of the letters. I hoped that typed out, I would be able to copy them all. However, the typed collection was about 322 pages.

I transcribed a few of the first letters, as well as his final letter. Again – this does not do justice to the collection, but it does give you a glimpse into its power and importance:

“Marietta, August 7th, 1862

Dear Mother,

Father perhaps wrote to you something about the draft which will probably be made in this state about one week from this time. I have been considering for several days, yes weeks, what it was best for me to do, and have finally concluded that I will volunteer rather than stand the draft. I have come to this conclusion deliberately after considering my chances for escaping the draft, and the respective advantages and disadvantages of the two services – the volunteer and the draft….If I stand draft and am selected, I shall have to go when the governor chooses to send me, and may be sent down South. If I volunteer, I can choose my regiment and officers. Dr. Leonard advised me to get an office and said that it was not my duty to go unless I did; but there is such a scrabble for offices that I do not wish to elbow my way into the crowd that blocks the door of the governor’s office. I have nothing especial to do and have rather a desire to assist in so good a war as this is. These are some of the reasons that have weighed with me in deciding my course… You will please write by the first mail that I may know what you think of my decision. Drafting commences on the 18th.

Your son with love,
Geo B. Turner”

Note that this was 1862, and his mother was in Connecticut. That her response was via telegram is telling:

(Telegram)”New London , Conn. 13 Aug 1862

G.B. Turner,

Marietta, O.

Do not volunteer. Stand draft. Get substitute. Letter on way.
Mother”

The letters don’t seem to be included in the collection, but the content of them is obvious from George’s reply:

“Marietta, Friday eve,

9 o’clock Aug 22nd, 1862

Dear Mother,

I received your last letter and Uncle George’s the morn…The telegram had prepared me for the opinions expressed in the letters and I was not surprised to find you decidedly opposed to the step I proposed to take. In fact, I have not received one word of encouragement from anybody. This has made me reflect the more but has not changed my mind. A question of duty must be decided by each man for himself. Tonight I carried my decision forward with an act and am now in the Army.

Do not read these words with surprise, nor suffer anxiety to swallow up the pleasure of your visit. Was there ever such a crisis as this? And am I an inanimate substance that I can lie still and not learn to think and act when events press so hard.

Duty led me to take the oath this evening. I have pondered well the reasons you and Uncle very kindly gave, and I could not thoughtlessly set aside such advice. But after much reflection I could not arrive at the same conclusion as you.

[section detailing his choices to volunteer rather than his brother, the one-in-three draft ratio, and that he enlisted in Capt. Thorniley’s company]

Fred. has seen service and will probably come home and render Father good aid in his business., while I could not remain here contentedly nor suffer Fred. To have all the honor of serving in the great army of volunteers.”

As mentioned, the intervening letters detail many things over the period of slightly over a year. Most express a sense of optimism and well-being that one might not expect once idealism meets reality. Here is George’s final letter, written three days before his regiments’ involvement in the Battle of Missionary Ridge, the battle in which he was struck behind the ear while leading his company (although he was not the officer in charge) and encouraging his comrades. He died a week later on 1 Dec 1863 :

“Headquarters 92 Reg OVI

Chattanooga, TN Nov 22nd, 1863

My Dear Mother,

We are preparing for battle. A general advance will probably be made tonight to clear the vicinity of this place from the enemy. All of our forces may be engaged. Perhaps only a part will have battle.

We feel confident in our strength, and especially in the favor of God, of driving the enemy from our immediate front. However, all is unseen and veiled. God knows.

Mother, if I return not with the victors, thank God and believe that the sacrifice was not too great for the interests at stake. I trust God and feel that in his hands, I am safe. If this reaches you do not conclude that I am dead for it may be that I am a prisoner or wounded, or some accident may send it

Much love to Father, Kate, Frederick, Charles and Edward, and yourself. Pray that I may do my duty, and trust your son in God’s hands.

Farewell, with a son’s love, Geo. B. Turner.”

This post is long enough, and I won’t lengthen it by expounding on the many, many things I find moving about the letters transcribed here. I hope that you share my fascination and admiration. This is a collection I intend to revisit. I hope if you have the chance, you will, too. I’d be hard pressed to come up with a collection that I found more moving. Thank you, George B. Turner. You made a difference.

Source: George Butler Turner Collection, Jun 1862-Dec 1863. MSS 73. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio

 

Posted in Family Findings, Thoughts and Musings | 4 Comments

Updated Site In Progress

Changes are afoot here at the Staats Place. Over the next week or so, the site will be getting a facelift. Not only that, there will be some new sections as I integrate and create sections for my professional research services. So if you check in and there is a garish font or a skewed box – it’s a good bet I am designing on the fly and in the process of changing something.  Would it be a better idea to develop offline and then upload the finished site? Probably, but designing live gives me that little extra incentive to make sure I actually finish it rather than procrastinating ;)

Posted in Houskeeping | Comments Off

Ohio Historical Markers Online

Husbands, we know we are all on a tight schedule while traveling hither and yon, and those arrival times must be kept. Even though we might be interested, we simply can’t stop for every “LOOK, a historical marker” demand. Ask my wife and she’ll claim I actually speed up. Sometimes I spot them first and try to distract her. Truth be told, I want to know what they say, too.

Fortunately, there is an answer: Remarkable Ohio: Marking Ohio’s History. This great site offered by the Ohio Historical Society is easy to navigate. You can search or browse for markers by location, keywords, and other criteria. You can even click a link to get a map to the markers. Pretty Slick. Check it out.

 

Remarkable Ohio homepage

Posted in Fun!, Misc. | Comments Off

SNGF: My Favorite Christmas Carol

This week’s Saturday Night Genealogy Challenge is this:
1) Identify your absolute favorite Christmas Carol or Holiday song.
2) Share your favorite carol or song in a blog post, in a comment to this post, or in a Facebook post or google Plus stream post.
3) For extra credit, post an audio or video of the carol or song (almost all are on www.YouTube.com) and the words to the song. Add the background of the song, and the artists if you can find them.

Let me begin by saying that picking a “favorite” Christmas carol is impossible. Christmas is an emotionally complicated holiday for many, I suspect. It certainly is for me. Therefore, my favorite carol is entirely dependent upon my prevailing feeling at any given moment of the season.

While all kinds of Christmas music can be had on the radio, I only had one Christmas album as a child. It was Christmas With the Chipmunks. Of course, the Chipmunks and David Seville may not have provided the most lofty of renditions, but being a kid, I didn’t know better. And my attachment to some of those songs remains to this day. One of those songs manages to capture the same swing of moods that I often experience this time of year – from melancholy to happiness, all within a three minute span. Without further adieu, I present Alvin the chipmunk and David Seville:

Well, I like this one, too – a beautiful mix of happy and sad:

Okay, maybe this one is:

Silent Night is always a good one, too..see I told you I couldn’t pick one favorite.
Merry Christmas to all, and to all a good night!

Posted in Fun! | 1 Comment